http://blog.uplevel.pl/index.php/2008/06/groovy-interesting-but-to-slow-now/ Webware and Rich Internet Applications Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:37:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://blog.uplevel.pl/index.php/2008/06/groovy-interesting-but-to-slow-now/#comment-23 Michał Wyrobek Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:33:27 +0000 http://blog.uplevel.pl/?p=40#comment-23 In fact my test is too old but, test you gave me isnt actually true, because there is 1.1.1 JRuby version, i new 1.1.2 version they improved performance again. JRuby starts now faster, so you can cut second in every test from this page. So we should both more on time ;) What is more "Since groovyc can jointly compile plain old java (which is slightly faster than Scala)" this is absolutely not true. In fact my test is too old but, test you gave me isnt actually true, because there is 1.1.1 JRuby version, i new 1.1.2 version they improved performance again. JRuby starts now faster, so you can cut second in every test from this page. So we should both more on time What is more “Since groovyc can jointly compile plain old java (which is slightly faster than Scala)” this is absolutely not true.

]]> http://blog.uplevel.pl/index.php/2008/06/groovy-interesting-but-to-slow-now/#comment-22 Andres Almiray Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:45:23 +0000 http://blog.uplevel.pl/?p=40#comment-22 Please get your facts straight before you make such bold statements. Those numbers were posted April 14 2007 against an unknown version of Groovy. Compare to what you can find here http://shemnon.com/speling/2008/05/groovy-faster-than-ruby-appare.html which come from a more recent benchmark (May 4 2008). Please get your facts straight before you make such bold statements. Those numbers were posted April 14 2007 against an unknown version of Groovy. Compare to what you can find here http://shemnon.com/speling/2008/05/groovy-faster-than-ruby-appare.html
which come from a more recent benchmark (May 4 2008).

]]>